This could include saving reports and data previously requested by examiners as “templates” for future use.
• Anticipate new requests and create a supplemental list or
inventory of information that may be pertinent to the next
examination based on the internal monitoring of:
• external feedback, industry developments or emerging issues, such as conducting an internal assessment
to “double check” the bank’s CRA assessment area
boundaries because of emerging regulator concerns
that some banks may be arbitrarily excluding minority-concentrated areas; and
• internal developments, such as delineating the rationale and net customer benefit of new, changed,
or discontinued products or services.
■ ■ PRINCIPLE #2: Effective program and exam preparation.
Periodically self-assess the effectiveness of the compliance
program and make modifications consistent with regulatory
expectations. The results can help direct management to material issues, strengths as well as challenges, which can be shared
with examiners. Self-assessments are helpful because they
document management’s re-evaluation of the organization’s
risks and the sufficiency of action taken to address identified
issues and recommendations from prior examinations, internal
compliance reviews, and audits.
■ ■ PRINCIPLE #3 Effective communication with all stakeholders. Complementing written information with verbal
communication is critical to ensuring that examiners gain a
sufficient and accurate understanding of the organization. The
discussions also provide bank management the opportunity
to get the examiner’s perspectives, which may be helpful
because it could be based on common practices that have
been observed at other institutions. Strategies that have been
particularly helpful in providing effective communication
“touch points” include:
• an initial call with regulator upon receipt of the information
request letter to review expectations and clarify any issues
regarding the request and other information about the
start-up of the examination;
• a scheduled meeting upon delivery of request letter responses
to “walk thru” (at least at a high level) what has been provided.
This practice has served to reduce follow-up requests as well
as the need to duplicate items previously provided; and
• an onsite orientation meeting (“the meet and greet”) with
examiner-in-charge and team to help them acclimate to the
organization. Also called the “first day meeting,” it provides
a critical opportunity for management to “tell the bank’s
story” by providing an overview of the institution’s activities
since the previous examination. The meeting also provides
a forum for the examiner to share the focus of their review
and initial observations based on the pre-examination assessment. Typically, the agenda highlights:
• key changes within the institution since the previous
examination, particularly as it relates to capacity,
Increasingly, examiners are asking for more information, often with a quick response turnaround.